Entry for 13 April
2012:
See: http://psyccritiquesblog.apa.org/2012/04/it-seems-so-counterintuitive.html
This is a really
interesting book review and it sounds like an even more interesting book, by
Steven Pinker: The Better Angels of Our
Nature. Pinker argues that
contrary to what we commonly believe, human beings are actually becoming not
more violent but less violent over historical time, and especially over the
past several centuries, including the most recent 100 years.
The APA blog folks
are asking for comments on why Pinker’s point seems so counter-intuitive. It seems to me to be obvious and
implicit in Pinker's point about the role of the mass media in overall violence
reduction: that learning in detail about others’ lives through accounts in
books and newspapers enables us to find empathy and compassion instead of
demonizing or dismissing others who appear to be very different from us. It seems to me that the flip side of
this is perceiving violence as more prevalent than it actually is: We recognize
ourselves in the Other's suffering, accessing both compassion for the Other and
fear for ourselves.
In the 1990's I did a
treatment development study comparing CBT to Process-Experiential therapy for
crime-related PTSD. Given
how high profile criminal victimization is in the media, and how preoccupied people
in our culture are with crime, we were very surprised at how hard it was to
recruit participants. We ended up
concluding that there is an exaggerated cultural preoccupation with crime, fed
by the news accounts continually boosting criminal victimization into our
awareness, making it psychologically more available than would be expected from
actual frequency. And that was before the CSI and NCIS franchise really
took off after the 9/11 attack!
No comments:
Post a Comment